Neuraxial Anesthesia Research Articles

Pain management In Total Knee Arthroplasty: Which helps in better post-operative outcomes?

Background: Individuals exhibit variations in pain perception and pain threshold, and these differences exist between the right and left limbs, resulting in biases related to inter-cerebral pain variability and inter-patient pain variability. Currently, there is limited available data comparing adductor canal block (ACB) with femoral nerve block (FNB) in individuals who have undergone bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: We conducted a prospective, non-randomized, controlled study involving patients scheduled for bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) under central neuraxial anesthesia. Following surgery, patients received intermittent 12-hourly boluses of 15 mL ropivacaine 0.5% through two distinct peripheral nerve blocks (adductor canal block - ACB and femoral nerve block - FNB) in either of the lower limbs. The primary objective was to evaluate the postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, while the secondary outcomes included the assessment of quadriceps muscle strength and the degree of flexion at the knee joint. Results: Out of the 70 patients evaluated for eligibility, 63 were enrolled, and 60 were included in the final analysis. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores after both blocks during periods of rest at 30 minutes, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 48 hours post-operatively did not exhibit any significant differences. However, VAS scores during rest at 24 hours and during exercise at 24 hours and 48 hours demonstrated a notable disparity. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in favour of adductor canal block (ACB) over femoral nerve block (FNB) regarding quadriceps muscle strength and the degree of knee flexion at 24 hours and 48 hours post-operatively. Conclusions: Adductor canal block (ACB) delivers comparable pain relief to femoral nerve block (FNB) both at rest and during passive exercise for up to 48 hours after surgery. ACB notably maintains the motor strength of quadriceps muscles when contrasted with FNB, and this preservation comes without introducing any additional complications.

Is Limited English Proficiency Associated With Differences in Care Processes and Treatment Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Orthopaedic Surgery? A Systematic Review

Background Approximately 25 million people in the United States have limited English proficiency. Current developments in orthopaedic surgery, such as the expansion of preoperative education classes or patient-reported outcome collection in response to bundled payment models, may exacerbate language-related barriers. Currently, there are mixed findings of the associations between limited English proficiency and care processes and outcomes, warranting a cross-study synthesis to identify patterns of associations. Questions/purposes In this systematic review, we asked: Is limited English proficiency associated with (1) differences in clinical care processes, (2) differences in care processes related to patient engagement, and (3) poorer treatment outcomes in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery in English-speaking countries? Methods On June 9, 2023, a systematic search of four databases from inception through the search date (PubMed, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus) was performed by a medical librarian. Potentially eligible articles were observational studies that examined the association between limited English proficiency and the prespecified categories of outcomes among pediatric and adult patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery or receiving care in an orthopaedic surgery setting. We identified 10,563 records, of which we screened 6966 titles and abstracts after removing duplicates. We reviewed 56 full-text articles and included 29 peer-reviewed studies (outcome categories: eight for clinical care processes, 10 for care processes related to patient engagement, and 15 for treatment outcomes), with a total of 362,746 patients or encounters. We extracted data elements including study characteristics, definition of language exposure, specific outcomes, and study results. The quality of each study was evaluated using adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scales for cohort or cross-sectional studies. Most studies had a low (48%) or moderate (45%) risk of bias, but two cross-sectional studies had a high risk of bias. To answer our questions, we synthesized associations and no-difference findings, further stratified by adjusted versus unadjusted estimates, for each category of outcomes. No meta-analysis was performed. Results There were mixed findings regarding whether limited English proficiency is associated with differences in clinical care processes, with the strongest adjusted associations between non-English versus English as the preferred language and delayed ACL reconstruction surgery and receipt of neuraxial versus general anesthesia for other non-Spanish versus English primary language in patients undergoing THA or TKA. Limited English proficiency was also associated with increased hospitalization costs for THA or TKA but not opioid prescribing in pediatric patients undergoing surgery for fractures. For care processes related to patient engagement, limited English proficiency was consistently associated with decreased patient portal use and decreased completion of patient-reported outcome measures per adjusted estimates. The exposure was also associated with decreased virtual visit completion for other non-Spanish versus English language and decreased postoperative opioid refill requests after TKA but not differences in attendance-related outcomes. For treatment outcomes, limited English proficiency was consistently associated with increased hospital length of stay and nonhome discharge per adjusted estimates, but not hospital returns. There were mixed findings regarding associations with increased complications and worse postoperative patient-reported outcome measure scores. Conclusion Findings specifically suggest the need to remove language-based barriers for patients to engage in care, including for patient portal use and patient-reported outcome measure completion, and to identify mechanisms and solutions for increased postoperative healthcare use. However, interpretations are limited by the heterogeneity of study parameters, including the language exposure. Future research should include more-precise and transparent definitions of limited English proficiency and contextual details on available language-based resources to support quantitative syntheses. Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study

Ultrasound-Assisted Spinal Anesthesia in a Patient with a Preexisting Lumbar Interspinous Spacer: A Case Report.

An interspinous spacer is a minimally invasive implantable device for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. The in situ implant may prevent safe and successful spinal anesthesia because its position can obstruct the path of the spinal needle. Lumbar neuraxial ultrasonography has been shown to aid in performance of neuraxial anesthesia in patients with challenging anatomy. Currently, there are no reported cases of ultrasound-assisted spinal anesthesia in patients with interspinous spacers. We present a case in which ultrasonography assisted the successful administration of a spinal anesthetic by avoiding an indwelling lumbar interspinous spacer.

Is a Rapid Recovery Protocol for THA and TKA Associated With Decreased 90-day Complications, Opioid Use, and Readmissions in a Health Safety-net Hospital?

Patients treated at a health safety-net hospital have increased medical complexity and social determinants of health that are associated with an increasing risk of complications after TKA and THA. Fast-track rapid recovery protocols (RRPs) are associated with reduced complications and length of stay in the general population; however, whether that is the case among patients who are socioeconomically disadvantaged in health safety-net hospitals remains poorly defined. When an RRP protocol is implemented in a health safety-net hospital after TKA and THA: (1) Was there an associated change in complications, specifically infection, symptomatic deep venous thromboembolism (DVT), symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), myocardial infarction (MI), and mortality? (2) Was there an associated difference in inpatient opioid consumption? (3) Was there an associated difference in length of stay and 90-day readmission rate? (4) Was there an associated difference in discharge disposition? An observational study with a historical control group was conducted in an urban, academic, tertiary-care health safety-net hospital. Between May 2022 and April 2023, an RRP consistent with current guidelines was implemented for patients undergoing TKA or THA for arthritis. We considered all patients aged 18 to 90 years presenting for primary TKA and THA as eligible. Based on these criteria, 562 patients with TKAs or THAs were eligible. Of these 33% (183) were excluded because they were lost before 90 days of follow-up and had incomplete datasets, leaving 67% (379) for evaluation. Patients in the historical control group (September 2014 to May 2022) met the same criteria, and 2897 were eligible. Of these, 31% (904) were excluded because they were lost before 90 days of follow-up and had incomplete datasets, leaving 69% (1993) for evaluation. The mean age in the historical control group was 61 ± 10 years and 63 ± 10 years in the RRP group. Both groups were 36% (725 of 1993 and 137 of 379) men. In the historical control group, 39% (770 of 1993) of patients were Black and 33% (658 of 1993) were White, compared with 38% (142 of 379) and 32% (121 of 379) in the RRP group, respectively. English was the most-spoken primary language, by 69% (1370 of 1993) and 68% (256 of 379) of the historical and RRP groups, respectively. A total of 65% (245 of 379) of patients in the RRP group had a peripheral nerve block compared with 54% (1070 of 1993) in the historical control group, and 39% (147 of 379) of them received spinal anesthesia, compared with 31% (615 of 1993) in the historical control group. The main elements of the RRP were standardization of preoperative visits, nutritional management, neuraxial anesthesia, accelerated physical therapy, and pain management. The primary outcomes were the proportions of patients with 90-day complications and opioid consumption. The secondary outcomes were length of stay, 90-day readmission, and discharge disposition. A multivariate analysis adjusting for age, BMI, gender, race, American Society of Anaesthesiologists class, and anesthesia type was performed by a staff biostatistician using R statistical programming. After controlling for the confounding variables as noted, patients in the RRP group had fewer complications after TKA than those in the historical control group (odds ratio 2.0 [95% confidence interval 1.3 to 3.3]; p = 0.005), and there was a trend toward fewer complications in THA (OR 1.8 [95% CI 1.0 to 3.5]; p = 0.06), decreased opioid consumption during admission (517 versus 676 morphine milligram equivalents; p = 0.004), decreased 90-day readmission (TKA: OR 1.9 [95% CI 1.3 to 2.9]; p = 0.002; THA: OR 2.0 [95% CI 1.6 to 3.8]; p = 0.03), and increased proportions of discharge to home (TKA: OR 2.4 [95% CI 1.6 to 3.6]; p = 0.01; THA: OR 2.5 [95% CI 1.5 to 4.6]; p = 0.002). Patients in the RRP group had no difference in the mean length of stay (TKA: 3.2 ± 2.6 days versus 3.1 ± 2.0 days; p = 0.64; THA: 3.2 ± 2.6 days versus 2.8 ± 1.9 days; p = 0.33). Surgeons should consider developing an RRP in health safety-net hospitals. Such protocols emphasize preparing patients for surgery and supporting them through the acute recovery phase. There are possible benefits of neuraxial and nonopioid perioperative anesthesia, with emphasis on early mobility, which should be further characterized in comparative studies. Continued analysis of opioid use trends after discharge would be a future area of interest. Analysis of RRPs with expanded inclusion criteria should be undertaken to better understand the role of these protocols in patients who undergo revision TKA and THA. Level III, therapeutic study.

Persistence of analgesic usage and opioid consumption in sarcopenic patients undergoing neuraxial anesthesia: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.

This study investigates the association between chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) and long-term postsurgical analgesic usage in patients undergoing neuraxial anesthesia, with a specific focus on the presence or absence of sarcopenia. To assess the rate of analgesic prescription, including opioids, at 3 and 6 months postsurgery for patients with and without preoperative sarcopenia, and to determine the impact of sarcopenia on analgesic use after neuraxial anesthesia surgery. Patients undergoing surgery under neuraxial anesthesia were categorized into sarcopenic and nonsarcopenic groups based on preoperative diagnosis using the ICD-10-CM code M62.84. Propensity score matching in a 1:4 ratio was applied for group matching. Analgesic prescription rates were evaluated at 3 and 6 months postsurgery, and multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze analgesic use, comparing patients with and without preoperative sarcopenia. Among 3805 surgical patients, 761 had sarcopenia, while 3044 did not. At 3 months postsurgery, 62.3% of sarcopenic patients received analgesics, with 2.9% receiving opioids, compared to 57.1% of nonsarcopenic patients receiving analgesics and 0.8% receiving opioids. At 6 months postsurgery, 30.8% of sarcopenic patients received analgesics (1.7% opioids), while 26.3% of non-sarcopenic patients received analgesics (0.3% opioids). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative sarcopenia was significantly associated with higher analgesic prescription rates at both 3 months (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.53) and 6 months (aOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07-1.42) postsurgery. Furthermore, sarcopenic patients exhibited significantly higher opioid prescription rates at 3 months (aOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-2.45) and 6 months (aOR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.12-4.96) postsurgery. Sarcopenia emerges as an independent risk factor for prolonged analgesic use after neuraxial anesthesia surgery and significantly elevates the risk of developing CPSP.

Comparison between peri‑capsular nerve group and supra inguinal fascia iliaca block for analgesia and ease of positioning during neuraxial anesthesia in hip fracture patients: A randomized double-blind trial

ABSTRACT Introduction Patients with fractured hips almost always have marked pain that results in unfavorable positioning for the central neuraxial block. It was revealed that regional block approaches, including suprainguinal fascia-iliaca compartment block (S-FICB) and pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, might effectively alleviate pain in patients with hip fractures. This research aimed to evaluate the influence of S-FICB and PENG block on patients positioning during central neuraxial block and compare their analgesic efficacy. Methods This randomized double-blinded trial included 60 cases aged ≥ 40 years old and ASA I-III with hip fracture with persistent pain and scheduled for surgery under spinal anesthesia (SA). Cases were randomized equally into two groups. Group I (S-FICB) received ultrasound (US) guided S-FICB, and group II (PENG group) received US guided PENG. Both blocks were performed by the same operator using 23 ml of ropivacaine 0.25% + 2 ml (8 mg) of dexamethasone. Results The ease of spinal positioning (EOSP) score was significantly better in the PENG group than the S-FICB group (p < 0.001). Twenty minutes after blocks, the numeric rating scale (NRS) reduced significantly in PENG than in SFICB groups at rest (p < 0.015) and movement (p < 0.010). The first request for analgesia, NRS in the first 24-hour period postoperatively, and the number of tramadol doses were similar between both groups (p = 0.552) and (p < 0.370), respectively. Conclusions Although each block provides comparable duration of postoperative analgesia, PENG block achieved more analgesic effect and easier positioning than S-FICB for SA in patients who had hip fractures surgery.

Protocolized oxytocin infusion for elective cesarean delivery: a retrospective before-and-after study.

To elucidate the clinical impact of the novel oxytocin protocol using a syringe pump with a stratified dose compared with the conventional practice of putting oxytocin into the bag. This is a retrospective cohort study. We collected the data of the patients who underwent elective cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia between June 2019 and May 2020. The patients were allocated to two groups according to oxytocin administration methods; the control group (the attending anesthesiologist put oxytocin 5-10 units in the infusion bag and adjusted manually after childbirth) and the protocol group (the oxytocin protocol gave oxytocin bolus 1 or 3 units depending on the PPH risk, followed by 5 or 10 unith-1 via a syringe pump). We compared the total amount of oxytocin within 24h postpartum, estimated blood loss, and adverse clinical events within 24h postpartum between the two groups. During the study period, 262 parturients were included. Oxytocin doses of intraoperative and postoperative were significantly lower in the protocol group (9.7 vs. 11.7 units, intraoperative, 15.9 vs. 18 units, postoperative). The subgroup analyses showed that the impact was more remarkable in the low PPH risk than in the high PPH risk. The multivariate linear regression analyses also confirmed the difference. The groups had no significant difference in blood loss, requirement of additional uterotonics, and other adverse events. Our oxytocin infusion protocol significantly reduced oxytocin requirements in elective cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia without increasing blood loss. However, we could not find other clinical benefits of the novel protocol.

Neuraxial Anesthesia and Analgesia During Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Narrative Review.

The purpose of this review is to synthesize and examine the literature on the use of neuraxial anesthesia and analgesia during cardiothoracic surgery. As cardiothoracic procedures often require systemic anticoagulation, neuraxial techniques are quite often underutilized due to the theoretical risk of epidural hematoma. In this review, we seek to examine the literature to review the indications and contraindications and to explore if neuraxial anesthesia and analgesia has a role in cardiothoracic surgery. Neuraxial techniques have multiple advantages during cardiothoracic surgery including coronary vasodilation, decreased sympathetic surge, and a decreased cortisol level leading to overall reduction in stress response. Multiple studies have shown an improvement in pain scores, reduction in pulmonary complications, faster extubation times, with minimal complications when neuraxial techniques are utilized in cardiothoracic surgeries. Given the numerous advantages and minimal complications of neuraxial techniques in cardiothoracic surgeries, we hope its utilization continues to increase. Moving forward, we hope additional studies continue to reaffirm the benefits of neuraxial anesthesia and analgesia for cardiothoracic surgeries to improve its utilization.

The impact of general anesthesia on the outcomes of preterm infants with gestational age less than 32 weeks delivered via cesarean section.

Recent advancements in China's perinatal and neonatal intensive care have significantly reduced neonatal mortality, yet preterm births before 32weeks remain the primary cause of neonatal fatalities and contribute to long-term disabilities. The prognosis of very preterm infants (VPIs) is significantly affected by factors including the intrauterine environment, delivery method and neonatal intensive care. Cesarean section which often used for preterm births has implications that are not fully understood, particularly concerning the type of anesthesia used. This study examines the impact of general anesthesia (GA) during cesarean delivery on VPI outcomes, aiming to identify strategies for mitigating GA-associated risks. This cohort study analyzed 1,029 VPIs born via cesarean section under 32 weeks' gestation at our single-center from 1 January 2018, to 31 December 2022. Detailed medical records, encompassing perioperative information, maternal data and neonatal outcomes were meticulously examined. The primary aim of this investigation was to compare maternal characteristics and neonatal outcomes between VPIs delivered under GA and neuraxial anesthesia (NA). A significance level of p < 0.05 was established. Of the 1,029 VPIs analyzed, 87.95% (n = 905) were delivered via NA and 12.05% (n = 124) via GA. Mothers with hypertensive pregnancy diseases and emergency operations were more inclined to choose GA. VPIs delivered under GA showed a lower Apgar score at one and 5minutes (p < 0.01), increased need for tracheal intubation resuscitation (32.2% vs. 12.2%, p < 0.01) and a greater incidence of severe neurological injury (SNI) (14.5% vs. 5%, p < 0.01). Multivariable analysis revealed GA was significantly associated with lower Apgar scores at one (OR 6.321, 95% CI 3.729-10.714; p < 0.01) and 5minutes (OR 4.535, 95% CI 2.975-6.913; p < 0.01), higher risk of tracheal intubation resuscitation (OR = 3.133, 95% CI = 1.939-5.061; p < 0.01) and SNI (OR = 3.019, 95% CI = 1.615-5.643; p < 0.01). Furthermore, for VPIs delivered under GA, a prolonged interval from skin incision to fetus delivery was associated with a lower 5-min Apgar score (p < 0.01). This study revealed the significant impact of GA on adverse outcomes among VPIs. In cases when GA is required, proactive measures should be instituted for the care of VPIs such as expediting the interval from skin incision to fetal delivery.

Ambulatory total hip and knee arthroplasty: a literature review and perioperative considerations.

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA), particularly for the hip and knee, is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures. The advancement/evolution of surgical and anesthesia techniques have allowed TJA to be performed on an ambulatory/same-day discharge basis. In this Continuing Professional Development module, we synthesize the perioperative evidence that may aid the development of successful ambulatory TJA pathways. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for ambulatory or fast-track TJA articles. In the absence of direct evidence for the ambulatory setting, we extrapolated the evidence from the in-patient TJA literature. Patient selection encompassing patient, medical, and social factors is fundamental for successful same-day discharge of patients following TJA. Evidence for the type of intraoperative anesthesia favours neuraxial technique for achieving same day discharge criteria and reduced perioperative complications. Availability of short-acting local anesthetic for neuraxial anesthesia would affect the anesthetic choice. Nonetheless, modern general anesthesia with multimodal analgesia and antithrombotics in a well selected population can be considered. Regional analgesia forms an integral part of the multimodal analgesia regime to reduce opioid consumption and facilitate same-day hospital discharge, reducing hospital readmission. For ambulatory total knee arthroplasty, a combination of adductor canal block with local anesthetic periarticular infiltration provided is a suitable regional analgesic regimen. Anesthesia for TJA has evolved as such that same-day discharge will become the norm for selected patients. It is essential to establish pathways for early discharge to prevent adverse effects and readmission in this population. As more data are generated from an increased volume of ambulatory TJA, more robust evidence will emerge for the ideal anesthetic components to optimize outcomes.

The impact of ultrasound- guided neuraxial blockade on anaesthetic outcomes in morbidly obese parturients: A case report

Obesity being a global epidemic is increasing in parturients nowadays, leading to super morbid obese parturient undergoing caesarean section. Caesarean section in morbidly obese poses many anaesthetic challenges under general anaesthesia a well as neuraxial anaesthesia. We report a case of super-super obese parturient with body mass index (BMI) of 63kg/m who underwent elective caesarean section under combined spinal epidural anaesthesia with ultrasound guidance successfully. We aim to highlight the anaesthetic considerations and implications associated with such patients.

Changes in rate-pressure product associated with pregnancy

In nonpregnant individuals, the rate-pressure product, the product of heart rate and systolic blood pressure, is used as a noninvasive surrogate of myocardial O2 consumption during cardiac stress testing. Pregnancy is considered a physiological cardiovascular stress test. Evidence describing the impact of pregnancy on myocardial O2 demand, as assessed by the rate-pressure product, is limited. This study aimed to describe changes in the rate-pressure product for each pregnancy trimester, during labor and delivery, and the postpartum period among low-risk pregnancies. This was a retrospective cohort study that assessed uncomplicated pregnancies delivered vaginally at term. We collected rate-pressure product (heart rate × systolic blood pressure) values preconception, during pregnancy for each trimester (at ≤13 weeks + 6/7 days, at 14 weeks + 0/7 days through 27 weeks + 6/7 days, and at ≥28 weeks + 0/7 days), during the labor and delivery encounter (hospital admission until complete cervical dilation, complete cervical dilation until placental delivery, and after placental delivery until hospital discharge), and during the outpatient postpartum visit at 2 to 6 weeks after delivery. We calculated the percentage change at each time point from the preconception rate-pressure product (delta rate-pressure product). We used a mixed-linear model to analyze differences in the mean delta rate-pressure product over time and the influence of prepregnancy age, prepregnancy body mass index, and neuraxial anesthesia status during labor and delivery on these estimates. Our cohort comprised 316 patients. The mean rate-pressure product increased significantly from preconception starting at the third trimester of pregnancy and during labor and delivery (P≤.05). The mean delta rate-pressure product peaked at 12% and 38% in the third trimester and during labor and delivery, respectively. Prepregnancy body mass index was inversely correlated with the mean delta rate-pressure product changes (estimate, -0.308; 95% confidence interval, -0.536 to -0.80; P=.008). In contrast, neither the prepregnancy age, nor neuraxial anesthesia status during labor had a significant influence on this parameter. This study validates the transient but significant increase in the rate-pressure product, a clinical estimate of myocardial O2 demand, during uncomplicated pregnancies delivered vaginally at term. Pregnant individuals with lower prepregnancy body mass index experienced a sharper increase in this parameter. Patients who receive neuraxial anesthesia during labor and delivery experience similar changes in the rate-pressure product as those who did not.

A commentary on "comparison of risk of complication between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis".

A commentary on "comparison of risk of complication between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis".

Neuraxial Block in A Post-Hemorrhagic Stroke Pregnant Patient

The selection of anesthetic methods for labor and delivery in individuals with elevated intracranial pressure relies on careful consideration of the risks and benefits. While neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia are favored for healthy individuals, they might not be suitable for individuals with intracranial lesions or a heightened risk of bleeding. Neuraxial block in post-stroke patients raises a concerning question about its safety due to the risk of herniation. The risk of perioperative major vascular events and mortality between general anesthesia and regional anesthesia in post-stroke patients is comparable. However, the neuraxial block shows benefits regarding airway manipulation and lower risk of thromboembolism. A successful and safe neuraxial anesthesia in a pregnant patient with a history of hemorrhagic stroke was presented in this case report.

Regional Anaesthesia Techniques for Orthopaedic Surgery at Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

Background: Regional anaesthesia has found its uses in many aspects of orthopaedic surgery including more recently, spine surgery. Neuraxial or regional anaesthesia are often the preferred techniques for surgical anaesthesia in patients with multiple comorbidities. For instance, osteoporosis-related complications such as hip fractures are common in the growing geriatric population. Orthopaedic surgery aims to recover functional capacity in patients but it carries a specific morbidity and mortality. Orthopaedic surgery conveys several challenges for the anaesthesiologist, including prevention of thromboembolic complications, reduction of peri- and postoperative bleeding and management of autologus blood transfusion and postoperative pain. Material and Methods: This is a prospective study was conducted in the Department of orthopaedic and Anaesthesia at Shadan Institute of Medical Sciences, Teaching Hospital and Research Center. Three hundred and ten consecutive cases posted for orthopaedic surgeries were taken up for study. Anaesthesia technique was decided based on the nature of surgery, willingness and medical status of the patient and experience of the anaesthesiologists. RA was planned whenever possible. In the morning of operation the RA technique was explained to the patients and intravenous (IV) access established. Preoperative medication was given using IV fentanyl and midazolam in titrated doses. Ketamine was used in children and appropriate block given using standard technique. Nerve stimulator was used wherever applicable Results: Age of the patients ranged from three months to 92 years. Maximum number of patients belonged to the age group of 21- 50 years (63.2%). As per the demographic data. In our study, Knee arthroscopy and repair was 28.38%, Femoral was 17.41%, Radius and ulna was 15.16% and least were Ankle and foot, Wrist and hand surgery was 1.93%. In our study Subarachnoid block was 40.96% followed by Combined spinalepidural 17.09%, General anaesthesia 12.90%. Conclusion: In a conclusion, the use of regional anesthesia techniques for postoperative outcomes in orthopedic surgeries has been investigated in lots of clinical studies and case reports. Most of the authors proposed that regional anesthesia in orthopedic patients may be associated with better postoperative pain control and a reduction in intraoperative blood loss when compared with general anesthesia. In the future regional anesthesia techniques will be more preferable anesthetic technique in orthopedic surgeries

A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of Patient and Hospital-Level Factors Predicting the Use of General Anesthesia for Cesarean Deliveries

(Int J Obstet Anesth. 2023:54:103638) A recent study reported that as parturient comorbidity increased, there was an increasing likelihood of receiving general anesthesia (GA) compared with neuraxial anesthesia (NA) for cesarean delivery (CD). This study expands on that research, and the authors theorize that in addition to patient factors, there may be hospital-level factors that increase the likelihood of GA for CD in certain patients.

Median Effective Dose of Ropivacaine for Prophylactic Cervical Cerclage in Chinese Women: A Dose-Finding Study

(Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023;48:168–172. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104242) Complications in pregnancy leading to preterm labor or miscarriage can occur for a variety of reasons. One reason that represents a significant public health burden is cervical incompetence or insufficiency. Current treatment guidelines focus on cervical cerclage as an effective treatment to prevent or arrest the effects of cervical insufficiency. Performing this procedure requires surgery, and therefore different anesthetic methods can be used to minimize pain and adverse outcomes for the patients, namely general or neuraxial anesthesia. One local anesthetic used for spinal neuraxial blocks in obstetrics is ropivacaine, but research has not explored its effect when used for cervical cerclage. This study from China was designed to find the median effective dose of intrathecal ropivacaine for cervical cerclage placement in 50% of patients (ED50). Secondary to this, the effective dose of intrathecal ropivacaine in 95% of patients (ED95) was also calculated. Other outcome measures included the duration of the sensory and motor blocks.

Quality of Recovery After Unplanned and Planned Cesarean Deliveries: A Prospective Observational Study Using the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 Tool.

There is a paucity of literature examining the differences between patient-reported outcome measures after planned and unplanned cesarean delivery using a validated quality of recovery tool. The Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10) scoring tool has been validated to quantify functional recovery after cesarean delivery. We aimed to use the ObsQoR-10 to compare the postoperative recovery characteristics of patients undergoing planned and unplanned cesarean deliveries. We conducted a prospective single-center observational study. Patients undergoing planned and unplanned cesarean deliveries under neuraxial anesthesia were asked to complete the ObsQoR-10 questionnaire 24 hours, 48 hours, and 1 week postpartum. We collected information on total in-hospital postoperative opioid consumption and patients´ perception of readiness for discharge at 24 and 48 hours postpartum. Additionally, patient characteristics were collected to assess their correlation with our findings. We included 112 patients (56 in each group). No statistical differences in ObsQoR-10 scores at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 1 week postpartum were observed between the planned and unplanned cesarean deliveries. Additionally, there was no difference between the groups in patients' perception of readiness for hospital discharge at 24 and 48 hours and opioid consumption in the first 2 days after surgery. Most patients in both groups did not think they would be ready for discharge at 24 hours postpartum. Analysis of the individual components of ObsQoR-10 at 24 hours showed a difference in the responses assessing the severity of shivering (higher in unplanned cesarean deliveries) and the ability to look after personal hygiene (lower in unplanned cesarean deliveries). As assessed by the ObsQoR-10, no significant difference in the quality of recovery was observed between patients undergoing planned and unplanned cesarean delivery.

Non-Neuraxial Chest and Abdominal Wall Regional Anesthesia for Intensive Care Physicians-A Narrative Review.

Multi-modal analgesic strategies, including regional anesthesia techniques, have been shown to contribute to a reduction in the use of opioids and associated side effects in the perioperative setting. Consequently, those so-called multi-modal approaches are recommended and have become the state of the art in perioperative medicine. In the majority of intensive care units (ICUs), however, mono-modal opioid-based analgesic strategies are still the standard of care. The evidence guiding the application of regional anesthesia in the ICU is scarce because possible complications, especially associated with neuraxial regional anesthesia techniques, are often feared in critically ill patients. However, chest and abdominal wall analgesia in particular is often insufficiently treated by opioid-based analgesic regimes. This review summarizes the available evidence and gives recommendations for peripheral regional analgesia approaches as valuable complements in the repertoire of intensive care physicians' analgesic portfolios.

Ultrasound-guided caudal anaesthesia combined with epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section: a randomized controlled clinical trial

BackgroundAlthough epidural anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia are currently the general choices for patients undergoing caesarean section, these two neuraxial anaesthesia methods still have drawbacks. Caudal anaesthesia has been considered to be more appropriate for gynaecological surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare epidural anaesthesia combined with caudal anaesthesia, spinal anaesthesia and single-space epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section with respect to postoperative comfort and intraoperative anaesthesia quality.MethodsIn this clinical trial, 150 patients undergoing elective caesarean section were recruited and randomized into three groups according to a ratio of 1:1:1to receive epidural anaesthesia only, spinal anaesthesia only or epidural anaesthesia combined with caudal anaesthesia. The primary outcome was postoperative comfort in the three groups. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative anaesthesia quality and the incidences of nausea, vomiting, postdural puncture headache, maternal bradycardia, or hypotension.ResultsMore patients were satisfied with the intraoperative anaesthesia quality in the EAC group than in the EA group (P = 0.001). The obstetrician was more significantly satisfied with the intraoperative anaesthesia quality in the SA and EAC groups than in the EA group (P = 0.004 and 0.020, respectively). The parturients felt more comfortable after surgery in the EA and EAC groups (P = 0.007). The incidence of maternal hypotension during caesarean section was higher in the SA group than in the EA and EAC groups (P = 0.001 and 0.019, respectively).ConclusionsEpidural anaesthesia combined with caudal anaesthesia may be a better choice for elective caesarean section. Compared with epidural anaesthesia and spinal anaesthesia, it has a higher quality of postoperative comfort and intraoperative anaesthesia.